South-West Rail: Modernising Nigeria's Obsolete Network

THE clarification by the South West Development Commission that its newly acquired rail licence does not authorise the construction of new tracks should not be an excuse for half measures. Rather, it should trigger a more urgent regional conversation about an entirely new railway philosophy.

Charles Akinola, the SWDC CEO, said, “The provisional rail operating and track access licence issued by the Nigerian Railway Corporation authorises SWDC to provide services on existing narrow- and standard-gauge rail corridors in the region. The licence does not extend to the construction of new rail tracks.”

The commission emphasised that the latest development would form the foundation of the “South-West Rail, Agro-Industrial and Logistics platform.”

Yet, the existing narrow-gauge relics were designed for a colonial economy focused on moving raw materials from the hinterland to the ports for export. They were never intended to integrate regional economies, stimulate industrial clusters, connect labour markets or support a modern region of more than 40 million people. That model is obsolete.

So This Happened (EP 256) Reviews SERAP Demands For Answers Over Missing N100bn…

The Development Agenda for Western Nigeria Commission has long proposed an integrated 44-city railway network.

In partnership with the SWDC, it must now pursue a system that combines upgraded standard-gauge corridors, strategic new tracks, inland logistics hubs, agro-industrial feeders, and metropolitan commuter lines into a single regional economic architecture.

Anything less would amount to attempting to build a modern economy with outdated infrastructure.

The region is already positioned for a rail-driven economic transformation. This encompasses the Lagos ports, Ogun’s industrial belts, the commercial gravity of Ibadan, the agricultural corridors of Oyo, Ondo and Ekiti, and the knowledge-economy potential of Osun and Ekiti.

It has a massive commuting population trapped daily in a traffic ecosystem defined by failed and dangerous roads.

The World Bank Group has repeatedly observed that railways “drastically lower transport costs, integrate disparate markets, and expand trade”. That insight is especially relevant to the South-West, where logistics inefficiency undermines productivity.

Manufacturers in Ogun lose billions of naira annually to truck delays on the Lagos-Ibadan corridor; agricultural produce from Ondo and Ekiti often perishes before reaching processors and urban markets.

A modern rail network would fundamentally alter that equation.

The Lagos–Sagamu–Ibadan corridor already hosts some of Nigeria’s largest manufacturing concentrations, including the Ogun industrial clusters, the Remo axis and the Ibadan Inland Dry Port.

Yet these economic nodes remain excessively dependent on roads overwhelmed by overloaded trucks.

Rail freight would dramatically reduce logistics costs for cement, steel, ceramics, FMCGs, agricultural produce and containerised cargo moving between Apapa, Tin Can, Lekki, Sagamu, Abeokuta and Ibadan. The result would be faster transportation, lower production costs, enhanced export competitiveness and stronger industrial profitability.

The South-West cannot industrialise sustainably on articulated trucks.

The Lagos-Ibadan Expressway has become an enduring metaphor for infrastructural dysfunction, with its unending rehabilitation and traffic congestion.

Rail offers a cheaper long-term freight solution because steel wheels on steel tracks move massive cargo volumes at lower energy and maintenance costs than highways, which cannot withstand heavy axle loads.

The implications for Lagos are profound. Efficient commuter rail would allow workers to live in Ibadan, Abeokuta, Ijebu-Ode or Osogbo while participating productively in the Lagos economy. This is precisely what rail systems achieved in parts of Europe and Asia.

Research on Germany’s Cologne–Frankfurt high-speed corridor found that connected regions experienced significant GDP expansion through deeper labour-market integration and business interaction.

Similarly, China’s Guiyang–Guangzhou corridor enabled industries to decentralise from expensive coastal cities into interior regions while remaining economically integrated.

The South-West should study those lessons carefully.

A regional rail grid would reduce pressure on Lagos housing, decentralise commercial growth, expand labour mobility and stimulate secondary cities.

Stations themselves would become economic hubs, attracting warehousing, retail, hospitality, technology parks and residential development.

The agricultural implications may be even more transformative. Oyo, Ondo, Ekiti and Osun possess enormous agro-industrial potential constrained by logistics failures. Farmers routinely lose large portions of their harvests because transportation chains remain unreliable, slow and expensive.

A regional rail network incorporating refrigerated freight systems and agro-logistics hubs could sharply reduce post-harvest losses while supporting processing industries in Ogun and Oyo.

Cocoa, cassava, timber, palm produce and grains could move rapidly to processors and export terminals, while rural communities become commercially connected instead of economically isolated.

According to transport economics studies referenced by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, rail systems become economically viable where traffic density is sufficiently high.

Few regions in West Africa possess higher concentrations of population, ports, universities, factories and commercial activity than South-West Nigeria.

Certainly, the challenges are immense. Standard-gauge construction is expensive. Land acquisition can become contentious.

Integrating narrow-gauge legacy systems with modern infrastructure creates engineering complications involving signalling, braking systems and rolling-stock compatibility. However, engineering problems have never been short of answers.

The long-term solution is gradual migration toward standard gauge as the regional backbone, with selective dual-gauge adaptations where transitional integration becomes necessary. Retaining the fragmented narrow-gauge systems would merely institutionalise inefficiency.

The African Development Bank Group has repeatedly warned that inadequate rail infrastructure across sub-Saharan Africa forces excessive freight onto roads, inflating logistics costs and weakening competitiveness. The South-West must refuse to replicate that stagnation.

Still, financing will determine whether this vision becomes reality or another mirage. The answer lies in disciplined public-private partnerships rather than unrealistic dependence on strained government budgets.

Design-Build-Finance-Operate-Maintain concessions, infrastructure bonds, track-access agreements and land-value capture models around stations can unlock the required capital.

If done properly, the railway network would become the backbone of a genuine South-West common market — a “One Bloc Economy” in more than rhetoric.

South-West leaders and economic planners must realise that no serious global economic bloc has built enduring industrial competitiveness on highways alone. Europe, China, Japan and India combined roads with high-capacity rail systems, integrating ports, factories, farms, labour markets and urban centres into coherent economic ecosystems.

The South-West must now make the same choice.

The licence secured by the SWDC should therefore be seen not as the destination, but merely the first signal from the station.